ed research

EDU800 – Week Eleven

, , , , ,

This week I deeply critically reviewed one article by Ertmer et. al, 2007, entitled, “Using peer feedback to enhance the quality of student online postings: An exploratory study” for my Critical Research Review #2. To start, it was better developed than the last paper we studied (for CRR 1). I’ll do a deep dive here […]

EDU800 – Week Eleven Read More »

EDU800 – Week Ten

, , , , , , , , , , , ,

This week I read five articles on the topic of New Literacy Research. The first, by Mills (2010) was entitled, “A review of the ‘digital turn’ in the new literacy studies.” The second, by Leu & Forzani (2012) was entitled, “New literacies in a Web 2.0, 3.0, 4.0… infinity world.” The third, by Knobel &

EDU800 – Week Ten Read More »

EDU800 – Week Nine

, , , , , ,

This week I critically reviewed a paper entitled “Digital game-based learning: Impact of instructions and feedback on motivation and learning effectiveness” by S. Erhel & E. Jamet (2013). My analysis follows. Problem The article does a poor job of stating a specific problem to be explored – the reader sort of has to dig for

EDU800 – Week Nine Read More »

EDU800 – Week Two

, , , , , , , ,

This week I read articles by Berliner (2002), Labaree (2003), Gutierrez & Penuel (2014), Shulman (1981), and White et al (2025). Like last week, the articles seem to build on one another. I will review them in the order I read them. First, in the Berliner (2002) article, the author describes social science as a

EDU800 – Week Two Read More »