This week I read three articles for class plus a fourth that interested me. You can learn more about what I got from each in my last blog post, but today I want to concentrate on the article “Envisioning AI for K-12” by Touretsky et. al (2019). Mainly, the authors stick to 5 “Big Ideas” […]
EDU800 – Week Twelve Read More »
This week I deeply critically reviewed one article by Ertmer et. al, 2007, entitled, “Using peer feedback to enhance the quality of student online postings: An exploratory study” for my Critical Research Review #2. To start, it was better developed than the last paper we studied (for CRR 1). I’ll do a deep dive here
EDU800 – Week Eleven Read More »
This week I read five articles on the topic of New Literacy Research. The first, by Mills (2010) was entitled, “A review of the ‘digital turn’ in the new literacy studies.” The second, by Leu & Forzani (2012) was entitled, “New literacies in a Web 2.0, 3.0, 4.0… infinity world.” The third, by Knobel &
This week I critically reviewed a paper entitled “Digital game-based learning: Impact of instructions and feedback on motivation and learning effectiveness” by S. Erhel & E. Jamet (2013). My analysis follows. Problem The article does a poor job of stating a specific problem to be explored – the reader sort of has to dig for
EDU800 – Week Nine Read More »
This week I read six articles. The first, by Richardson & Swan (2003) was entitled “Examining social presence in online courses in relation to students’ perceived learning and satisfaction.” The second, by Singh & Thurman (2019) was entitled “How many ways can we define online learning? A systematic literature review of definitions of online learning
EDU800 – Week Eight Read More »
